FTXO vs. QABA
FTXO (First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF) and QABA (First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund) are both Financials Equities funds from First Trust - FTXO tracks the NASDAQ US Banks Index while QABA tracks the NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXO returned 5.35%/yr vs 3.09%/yr for QABA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
FTXO vs. QABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXO achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than QABA's 8.16% return.
FTXO
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 24.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- —
QABA
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 7.37%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
FTXO vs. QABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF | 0.81% | 21.32% | 29.05% | 0.05% | -17.93% | 40.53% | -12.53% | 30.11% | -21.79% | 14.25% |
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 8.16% | 4.62% | 14.49% | -2.18% | -9.01% | 34.20% | -10.70% | 22.85% | -16.47% | 0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXO and QABA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FTXO and QABA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTXO vs. QABA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXO
QABA
Financial Services
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FTXO
QABA
Technology
FTXO
QABA
-
Basic Materials
FTXO
-
QABA
-
Communication Services
FTXO
-
QABA
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXO
-
QABA
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXO
-
QABA
-
Energy
FTXO
-
QABA
-
Healthcare
FTXO
-
QABA
-
Industrials
FTXO
-
QABA
Real Estate
FTXO
-
QABA
-
Utilities
FTXO
-
QABA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXO vs. QABA — Risk / Return Rank
FTXO
QABA
FTXO vs. QABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXO | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 3.69 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXO | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.83 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.12 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.34 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
FTXO vs. QABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXO drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than QABA's maximum drawdown of -49.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXO and QABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXO | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.26% | -49.30% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.69% | -12.49% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.84% | -25.82% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.55% | -42.93% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.10% | -4.25% | -3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.88% | -11.43% | -4.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 5.02% | +0.99% |
Volatility
FTXO vs. QABA - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) have volatilities of 5.69% and 5.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXO | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 5.63% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.46% | 15.22% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.80% | 22.50% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 26.50% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 28.69% | +1.29% |
FTXO vs. QABA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FTXO and QABA have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
FTXO vs. QABA - Dividend Comparison
FTXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than QABA's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF | 1.78% | 1.92% | 2.18% | 3.20% | 2.94% | 1.64% | 2.74% | 2.53% | 3.51% | 1.09% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 2.40% | 2.52% | 2.37% | 2.71% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 1.90% | 1.42% | 1.13% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXO and QABA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXO has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to QABA (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXO dropped -55.26% vs QABA's -49.30%.
On 5-year performance, FTXO leads with 5.35% vs 3.09% for QABA. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXO has performed better with a 5.35% return vs 3.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXO and QABA have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.78% for FTXO.
FTXO tracks NASDAQ US Banks Index, while QABA tracks NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index.
FTXO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXO and QABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer