FTXL vs. QTUM
FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXL returned 34.02%/yr vs 28.96%/yr for QTUM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTXL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
FTXL vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXL achieves a 110.86% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 52.13% return.
FTXL
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 21.46%
- YTD
- 110.86%
- 6M
- 111.07%
- 1Y
- 214.18%
- 3Y*
- 61.46%
- 5Y*
- 34.02%
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 19.63%
- YTD
- 52.13%
- 6M
- 48.25%
- 1Y
- 92.25%
- 3Y*
- 52.13%
- 5Y*
- 28.96%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 110.86% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 46.08% | 61.77% | -20.70% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 52.13% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXL and QTUM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between FTXL and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTXL vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXL
QTUM
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FTXL
QTUM
Industrials
FTXL
QTUM
Basic Materials
FTXL
-
QTUM
-
Communication Services
FTXL
-
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
FTXL
-
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
FTXL
-
QTUM
-
Energy
FTXL
-
QTUM
-
Financial Services
FTXL
-
QTUM
-
Healthcare
FTXL
-
QTUM
Real Estate
FTXL
-
QTUM
-
Utilities
FTXL
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXL vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
FTXL
QTUM
FTXL vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.54 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.86 | 6.08 | +8.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 55.40 | 22.92 | +32.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00 | 3.53 | +2.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 1.10 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 1.07 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
FTXL vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXL drawdown since its inception was -43.87%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXL and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.87% | -38.45% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.51% | -15.26% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.57% | -25.39% | -16.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.87% | -38.45% | -5.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -1.35% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.55% | -8.25% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 4.04% | -0.16% |
Volatility
FTXL vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a higher volatility of 14.14% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 9.78%. This indicates that FTXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.14% | 9.78% | +4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.04% | 20.32% | +8.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.94% | 26.27% | +9.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.03% | 26.56% | +9.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.25% | 27.16% | +7.09% |
FTXL vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXL vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than QTUM's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXL and QTUM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.14%) compared to QTUM (9.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXL dropped -43.87% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.02% vs 28.96% for QTUM. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 9.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.02% return vs 28.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.13% for FTXL.
FTXL is categorized as Semiconductors, while QTUM is Technology Equities. FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXL and 0.40% for QTUM.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.00 vs 3.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXL and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer