PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXL vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXL vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXL achieves a 115.70% return, which is significantly higher than QCLN's 52.94% return.


FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*

QCLN

1D
-0.41%
1M
16.40%
YTD
52.94%
6M
50.79%
1Y
120.21%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXL vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%32.19%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
52.94%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-12.38%32.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXL and QCLN is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.70

The correlation between FTXL and QCLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTXL vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTXL
QCLN

Technology

99.5%
20.8%

Industrials

0.5%
30.2%

Basic Materials

-

9.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

13.2%

Financial Services

-

1.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

13.2%

Technology

FTXL
99.5%
QCLN
20.8%

Industrials

FTXL
0.5%
QCLN
30.2%

Basic Materials

FTXL

-

QCLN
9.4%

Communication Services

FTXL

-

QCLN

-

Consumer Cyclical

FTXL

-

QCLN
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

FTXL

-

QCLN

-

Energy

FTXL

-

QCLN
13.2%

Financial Services

FTXL

-

QCLN
1.9%

Healthcare

FTXL

-

QCLN

-

Real Estate

FTXL

-

QCLN

-

Utilities

FTXL

-

QCLN
13.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXL vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXL vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTXLQCLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.48

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.62

7.62

+8.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

58.28

26.28

+32.00

FTXL vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXL Sharpe Ratio is 6.33, which is higher than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXL and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTXLQCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.33

3.49

+2.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.06

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.20

+0.73

Drawdowns

FTXL vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXL drawdown since its inception was -43.87%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXL and QCLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXLQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.87%

-76.18%

+32.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

-15.86%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.57%

-56.08%

+14.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

-69.49%

+25.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-20.99%

+20.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.56%

-43.45%

+32.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

4.59%

-0.71%

Volatility

FTXL vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a higher volatility of 14.28% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) at 12.56%. This indicates that FTXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXLQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.28%

12.56%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.98%

26.02%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.94%

34.88%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.02%

37.97%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.25%

34.91%

-0.66%

FTXL vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FTXL and QCLN have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

FTXL vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than QCLN's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%0.00%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.15%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXL and QCLN have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to QCLN (12.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXL dropped -43.87% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 2.16% for QCLN. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, QCLN has been the lower-risk option at 12.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXL and QCLN have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

QCLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.

FTXL is categorized as Semiconductors, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index, while QCLN tracks NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 3.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXL and QCLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer