PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXL vs. FLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXL vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXL achieves a 108.47% return, which is significantly higher than FLTW's 65.68% return.


FTXL

1D
2.27%
1M
10.09%
YTD
108.47%
6M
110.95%
1Y
197.22%
3Y*
57.13%
5Y*
33.62%
10Y*

FLTW

1D
0.59%
1M
9.23%
YTD
65.68%
6M
71.97%
1Y
100.51%
3Y*
39.63%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXL vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
108.47%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%-2.80%
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
65.68%32.00%16.68%30.05%-27.51%29.46%29.77%31.23%-9.32%-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXL and FLTW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.64

The correlation between FTXL and FLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTXL vs. FLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTXL
FLTW

Technology

99.5%
75.6%

Industrials

0.5%
4.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.9%

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.9%

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

12.6%

Healthcare

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FTXL
99.5%
FLTW
75.6%

Industrials

FTXL
0.5%
FLTW
4.0%

Basic Materials

FTXL

-

FLTW
2.9%

Communication Services

FTXL

-

FLTW
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FTXL

-

FLTW
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

FTXL

-

FLTW
0.9%

Energy

FTXL

-

FLTW
0.1%

Financial Services

FTXL

-

FLTW
12.6%

Healthcare

FTXL

-

FLTW
0.6%

Real Estate

FTXL

-

FLTW

-

Utilities

FTXL

-

FLTW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXL vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FLTW
FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXL vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTXLFLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.58

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.68

9.29

+4.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

47.98

27.95

+20.04

FTXL vs. FLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXL Sharpe Ratio is 5.10, which is higher than the FLTW Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXL and FLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTXL vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXL drawdown since its inception was -43.87%, which is greater than FLTW's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXL and FLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXLFLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.87%

-38.00%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

-10.87%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.57%

-26.45%

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

-38.00%

-5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

-4.47%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-8.42%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

3.61%

+0.52%

Volatility

FTXL vs. FLTW - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a higher volatility of 19.23% compared to Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) at 15.27%. This indicates that FTXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXLFLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.23%

15.27%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.79%

23.85%

+8.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.90%

27.98%

+10.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.63%

22.90%

+13.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.55%

22.03%

+12.52%

FTXL vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTW's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTXL vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison

FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than FLTW's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
1.51%2.51%1.89%2.85%3.16%2.31%2.14%3.00%1.06%0.00%0.00%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.13%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXL and FLTW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (19.23%) compared to FLTW (15.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXL dropped -43.87% vs FLTW's -38.00%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 33.62% vs 20.89% for FLTW. On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLTW has been the lower-risk option at 15.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 33.62% return vs 20.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.

FLTW has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.13% for FTXL.

FTXL is categorized as Semiconductors, while FLTW is Asia Pacific Equities. FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index, while FLTW tracks FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXL and 0.19% for FLTW.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.10 vs 3.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXL and FLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer