PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXH vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXH vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXH achieves a 16.84% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 10.29% return.


FTXH

1D
-1.39%
1M
6.68%
6M
14.96%
YTD
16.84%
1Y
46.81%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*

YCS

1D
-0.78%
1M
2.50%
6M
8.31%
YTD
10.29%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
24.01%
10Y*
13.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXH vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
16.84%24.15%2.98%-1.41%2.55%6.14%11.73%22.13%-9.51%19.44%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
10.29%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXH and YCS is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.00

The correlation between FTXH and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXH vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXH
FTXH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FTXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXH Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXH Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXH vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTXHYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.04

3.76

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.83

11.88

+5.95

FTXH vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXH Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXH and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTXH vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXHYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.11%

-49.56%

+17.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-8.30%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

-23.05%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.51%

-27.32%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-1.01%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-19.82%

+14.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.62%

-0.08%

Volatility

FTXH vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 3.05%. This indicates that FTXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXHYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

3.05%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

11.94%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

16.66%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

21.09%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

18.75%

-0.31%

FTXH vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTXH vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
1.11%1.41%1.66%1.55%1.11%1.03%0.82%0.67%0.91%2.18%0.19%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXH and YCS have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXH has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to YCS (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXH dropped -32.11% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 24.01% vs 9.52% for FTXH. On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 24.01% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

FTXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 1.00% for YCS.

FTXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXH and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer