FTXH vs. UNHW
FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. FTXH is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTXH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.
Performance
FTXH vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXH achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 32.80% return.
FTXH
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- 6M
- 13.43%
- YTD
- 14.98%
- 1Y
- 43.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
UNHW
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 31.52%
- YTD
- 32.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXH vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 14.98% | 2.16% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 32.80% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXH and UNHW is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.28 |
FTXH vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXH
UNHW
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
FTXH
UNHW
Basic Materials
FTXH
-
UNHW
-
Communication Services
FTXH
-
UNHW
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXH
-
UNHW
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXH
-
UNHW
-
Energy
FTXH
-
UNHW
-
Financial Services
FTXH
-
UNHW
-
Industrials
FTXH
-
UNHW
-
Real Estate
FTXH
-
UNHW
-
Technology
FTXH
-
UNHW
-
Utilities
FTXH
-
UNHW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXH vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank
FTXH
UNHW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTXH vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTXH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTXH vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, roughly equal to the maximum UNHW drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and UNHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.11% | -32.28% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -1.66% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -10.39% | +4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | — | — |
Volatility
FTXH vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 47.35% | -29.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 47.35% | -30.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 47.35% | -28.91% |
FTXH vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXH vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison
FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than UNHW's 19.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.12% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 19.69% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXH and UNHW have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 19.69%, compared with 1.12% for FTXH.
FTXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 0.99% for UNHW.
Find the right allocation for FTXH and UNHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer