FTXH vs. UNHW
FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. FTXH is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FTXH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.
Performance
FTXH vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXH achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 28.89% return.
FTXH
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 49.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.02%
UNHW
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- 6M
- 54.46%
- YTD
- 28.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $132.42M | $64.10M | $22.26M | |
| $423.60K | $609.21K | $366.99K |
FTXH vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 17.64% | 2.16% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 28.89% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXH and UNHW is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXH vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank
FTXH
UNHW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTXH vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTXH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTXH vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, roughly equal to the maximum UNHW drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and UNHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.11% | -32.28% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -5.84% | +3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -9.80% | +4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | — | — |
Volatility
FTXH vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 46.31% | -29.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 46.31% | -29.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 46.31% | -27.88% |
FTXH vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXH vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison
FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than UNHW's 22.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.10% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 22.57% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXH and UNHW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 22.57%, compared with 1.10% for FTXH.
FTXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 0.99% for UNHW.
Find the right allocation for FTXH and UNHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer