PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FTXH vs. UNHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FTXH vs. UNHW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. FTXH is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTXH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.

Performance

FTXH vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXH achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 27.05% return.

FTXH

1D
1.37%
1M
4.15%
YTD
10.44%
6M
9.18%
1Y
44.59%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
—

UNHW

1D
0.63%
1M
6.62%
YTD
27.05%
6M
29.58%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXH vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF		10.44%2.16%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF		27.05%1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXH and UNHW is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.25

FTXH vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FTXH
UNHW

Healthcare

100.0%
29.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FTXH
100.0%
UNHW
29.0%

Basic Materials

FTXH

-

UNHW

-

Communication Services

FTXH

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Cyclical

FTXH

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Defensive

FTXH

-

UNHW

-

Energy

FTXH

-

UNHW

-

Financial Services

FTXH

-

UNHW

-

Industrials

FTXH

-

UNHW

-

Real Estate

FTXH

-

UNHW

-

Technology

FTXH

-

UNHW

-

Utilities

FTXH

-

UNHW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF

Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF

Often compared with FTXH:
FTXH vs. PPHFTXH vs. BBPFTXH vs. XLVFTXH vs. MEDIFTXH vs. FXAIXFTXH vs. SPUSFTXH vs. ^GSPC
Often compared with UNHW:
UNHW vs. ARMWUNHW vs. VHTUNHW vs. NERDUNHW vs. BBCUNHW vs. MUUUNHW vs. BETZUNHW vs. XTAP

Return for Risk

FTXH vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FTXH
FTXH Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FTXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXH Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXH Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
UNHW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXH vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FTXHUNHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.61

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.81

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.00

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.65

—

—

FTXH vs. UNHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTXH vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, roughly equal to the maximum UNHW drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and UNHW.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FTXHUNHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.11%

-32.28%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.51%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.45%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-11.32%

+5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

—

—

Volatility

FTXH vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FTXHUNHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.18%

48.61%

-31.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

48.61%

-32.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

48.61%

-30.19%

FTXH vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTXH vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than UNHW's 18.13% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF		1.16%1.41%1.66%1.55%1.11%1.03%0.82%0.67%0.91%2.18%0.19%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF		18.13%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FTXH and UNHW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 1.16% for FTXH.

FTXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 0.99% for UNHW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXH and UNHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer