FTXH vs. RBLU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) and RBLU (T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while RBLU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Roblox Corp. Class A (RBLX). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTXH returned 48.05% vs -89.20% for RBLU. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. FTXH charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for RBLU.

Performance

FTXH vs. RBLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXH achieves a 17.45% return, which is significantly higher than RBLU's -70.52% return.

FTXH

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: 8.29%
• 6M: 15.60%
• YTD: 17.45%
• 1Y: 48.05%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: —

RBLU

• 1D: -10.80%
• 1M: 13.03%
• 6M: -72.41%
• YTD: -70.52%
• 1Y: -89.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXH vs. RBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF	17.45%	18.83%
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF	-70.52%	23.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXH and RBLU is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025	-0.06

Return for Risk

FTXH vs. RBLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXH

FTXH Risk / Return Rank: 94
FTXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FTXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FTXH Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FTXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FTXH Martin Ratio Rank: 93

RBLU

RBLU Risk / Return Rank: 2
RBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
RBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
RBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
RBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
RBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXH vs. RBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTXH	RBLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	-0.71	+3.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.10	-1.46	+5.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	0.82	+0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.46	-0.94	+7.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.87	-1.29	+20.15

FTXH vs. RBLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXH Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the RBLU Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXH and RBLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTXH vs. RBLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, smaller than the maximum RBLU drawdown of -94.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and RBLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTXH	RBLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.11%	-94.76%	+62.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.47%	-94.76%	+87.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.35%	-91.77%	+89.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.78%	-46.95%	+41.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	69.22%	-66.67%

Volatility

FTXH vs. RBLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) is 5.77%, while T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) has a volatility of 45.36%. This indicates that FTXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTXH	RBLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.77%	45.36%	-39.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.65%	105.21%	-92.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.51%	127.25%	-109.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.52%	120.08%	-103.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.44%	120.08%	-101.64%

FTXH vs. RBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RBLU's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTXH vs. RBLU - Dividend Comparison

FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than RBLU's 4.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF	1.10%	1.41%	1.66%	1.55%	1.11%	1.03%	0.82%	0.67%	0.91%	2.18%	0.19%
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF	4.39%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTXH and RBLU in my portfolio?

FTXH and RBLU have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTXH or RBLU?

RBLU has higher volatility (45.36%) compared to FTXH (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXH dropped -32.11% vs RBLU's -94.76%.

Which ETF is better, FTXH or RBLU?

On 1-year performance, FTXH leads with 48.05% vs -89.20% for RBLU. On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTXH has been the lower-risk option at 5.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTXH or RBLU?

Over the 1-year period, FTXH has performed better with a 48.05% return vs -89.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTXH or RBLU?

FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for RBLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTXH or RBLU?

RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 1.10% for FTXH.

What is the main difference between FTXH and RBLU?

FTXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while RBLU is Leveraged Equities. FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while RBLU tracks Roblox Corp. Class A (RBLX). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 1.05% for RBLU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.