FTXH vs. PBPH
FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - FTXH tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTXH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
FTXH vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXH achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's 2.63% return.
FTXH
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 44.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- —
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXH vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 10.44% | 1.81% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 2.63% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXH and PBPH is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXH vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
FTXH
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTXH vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTXH | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTXH vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXH | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.11% | -11.10% | -21.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.21% | +5.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -4.36% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | — | — |
Volatility
FTXH vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXH | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 17.07% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 17.07% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 17.07% | +1.35% |
FTXH vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXH vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.16% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, FTXH and PBPH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXH.
FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for FTXH and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer