FTWG.L vs. LDGL.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTWG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist) and LDGL.L (L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - FTWG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while LDGL.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTWG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for LDGL.L.

Performance

FTWG.L vs. LDGL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FTWG.L is traded in GBp, while LDGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDGL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

FTWG.L

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 5.92%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 12.72%
• 1Y: 30.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LDGL.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTWG.L vs. LDGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist	8.88%
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing	7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWG.L and LDGL.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026	0.68

Return for Risk

FTWG.L vs. LDGL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTWG.L

FTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
FTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTWG.L vs. LDGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTWG.L	LDGL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.35	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTWG.L	LDGL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.55	1.47	+0.08

Drawdowns

FTWG.L vs. LDGL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTWG.L drawdown since its inception was -17.78%, which is greater than LDGL.L's maximum drawdown of -8.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWG.L and LDGL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTWG.L	LDGL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.78%	-8.76%	-9.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-1.15%	+0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-2.71%	+0.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTWG.L	LDGL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.31%	14.39%	-4.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.90%	14.39%	-2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.90%	14.39%	-2.49%

FTWG.L vs. LDGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTWG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LDGL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTWG.L vs. LDGL.L - Dividend Comparison

FTWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than LDGL.L's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist	1.21%	1.34%	1.50%	0.70%
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTWG.L and LDGL.L in my portfolio?

FTWG.L and LDGL.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTWG.L or LDGL.L?

On fees, FTWG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTWG.L or LDGL.L?

FTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for LDGL.L.

What is the main difference between FTWG.L and LDGL.L?

FTWG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while LDGL.L is Global Equity Income. FTWG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while LDGL.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FTWG.L and 0.29% for LDGL.L.