FTWD.L vs. SGLP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L).
FTWD.L and SGLP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTWD.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE All-World Index. It was launched on Feb 20, 2024. SGLP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Jun 24, 2009. Both FTWD.L and SGLP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FTWD.L vs. SGLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTWD.L vs. SGLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWD.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist | -4.23% | 22.55% | 17.90% | 8.37% |
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | 7.43% | 65.19% | 26.00% | 7.91% |
Different Trading Currencies
FTWD.L is traded in USD, while SGLP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTWD.L achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than SGLP.L's 5.56% return.
FTWD.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 20.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGLP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -13.19%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 18.38%
- 1Y
- 45.55%
- 3Y*
- 31.96%
- 5Y*
- 21.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTWD.L vs. SGLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTWD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLP.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FTWD.L vs. SGLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
FTWD.L
SGLP.L
FTWD.L vs. SGLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTWD.L | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.75 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 2.23 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.55 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.48 | 10.03 | -2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTWD.L | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.75 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.47 | +0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTWD.L and SGLP.L is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FTWD.L vs. SGLP.L - Dividend Comparison
FTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while SGLP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWD.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist | 1.43% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 0.69% |
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FTWD.L vs. SGLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTWD.L drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum SGLP.L drawdown of -41.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWD.L and SGLP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTWD.L | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -38.83% | +22.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -17.89% | +6.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.17% | -11.70% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -13.38% | +11.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 4.21% | -1.73% |
Volatility
FTWD.L vs. SGLP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) is 5.05%, while Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) has a volatility of 10.49%. This indicates that FTWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTWD.L | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 10.49% | -5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.73% | 21.45% | -12.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 25.89% | -10.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 17.14% | -3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 15.64% | -2.23% |