FTVNX vs. FVCSX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FTVNX (Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund) and FVCSX (Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FTVNX returned 5.38%/yr vs 8.29%/yr for FVCSX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTVNX charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.92%/yr for FVCSX.

Performance

FTVNX vs. FVCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund (FTVNX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTVNX achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than FVCSX's 25.70% return.

FTVNX

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 4.32%
• 6M: 3.52%
• YTD: 7.22%
• 1Y: 1.62%
• 3Y*: 7.77%
• 5Y*: 5.38%
• 10Y*: —

FVCSX

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 2.35%
• 6M: 17.84%
• YTD: 25.70%
• 1Y: 35.30%
• 3Y*: 10.99%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTVNX vs. FVCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FTVNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund	7.22%	-1.98%	9.77%	12.04%	-7.49%	32.93%	6.32%	27.76%	-13.29%
FVCSX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C	25.70%	7.23%	-6.69%	19.32%	-8.35%	31.94%	7.10%	33.09%	-19.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FTVNX and FVCSX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018	0.92

The correlation between FTVNX and FVCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FTVNX vs. FVCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTVNX

FTVNX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FTVNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FTVNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FTVNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FTVNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FTVNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FVCSX

FVCSX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FVCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FVCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FVCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FVCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FVCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTVNX vs. FVCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund (FTVNX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTVNX	FVCSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	2.04	-1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.26	2.94	-2.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.35	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	3.54	-3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.24	13.11	-12.87

FTVNX vs. FVCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTVNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the FVCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTVNX and FVCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTVNX vs. FVCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTVNX drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum FVCSX drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTVNX and FVCSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTVNX	FVCSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-70.38%	+27.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.52%	-9.89%	-4.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.46%	-37.07%	+16.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.46%	-37.07%	+16.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-0.39%	-0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.30%	-11.15%	+4.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.14%	2.67%	+3.47%

Volatility

FTVNX vs. FVCSX - Volatility Comparison

Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund (FTVNX) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) at 4.70%. This indicates that FTVNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTVNX	FVCSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	4.70%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.90%	12.01%	-0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.77%	17.23%	-0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.33%	21.04%	-2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.60%	22.13%	-0.53%

FTVNX vs. FVCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTVNX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than FVCSX's 1.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTVNX vs. FVCSX - Dividend Comparison

FTVNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than FVCSX's 10.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTVNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund	1.49%	1.59%	1.08%	1.31%	2.13%	1.41%	0.14%	1.03%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FVCSX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C	10.40%	13.08%	0.00%	2.96%	2.23%	9.80%	0.33%	5.50%	18.83%	8.78%	25.66%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTVNX and FVCSX in my portfolio?

FTVNX and FVCSX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTVNX or FVCSX?

FTVNX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to FVCSX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTVNX dropped -42.81% vs FVCSX's -70.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FVCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.