PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTT.TO vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTT.TO vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Finning International Inc. (FTT.TO) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTT.TO is traded in CAD, while PLTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PLTR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTT.TO achieves a 30.45% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -26.53% return.


FTT.TO

1D
2.22%
1M
-5.42%
YTD
30.45%
6M
29.08%
1Y
78.99%
3Y*
38.08%
5Y*
27.84%
10Y*
19.54%

PLTR

1D
-2.18%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
-26.53%
6M
-29.28%
1Y
-4.27%
3Y*
102.99%
5Y*
43.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTT.TO vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FTT.TO
Finning International Inc.
30.45%99.50%2.20%16.93%8.70%21.09%32.98%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-26.53%124.30%377.77%161.08%-62.51%-22.71%124.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FTT.TO and PLTR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTT.TO:

CA$12.64B

PLTR:

$329.05B

EPS

FTT.TO:

CA$5.11

PLTR:

$0.89

PE Ratio

FTT.TO:

18.86

PLTR:

144.03

PEG Ratio

FTT.TO:

1.26

PLTR:

0.84

PS Ratio

FTT.TO:

1.20

PLTR:

62.90

PB Ratio

FTT.TO:

4.39

PLTR:

38.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTT.TO:

CA$10.64B

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTT.TO:

CA$2.44B

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

FTT.TO:

CA$1.21B

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTT.TO vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTT.TO
FTT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FTT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FTT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTT.TO vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Finning International Inc. (FTT.TO) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTT.TOPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.03

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

-0.08

+4.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.26

-0.15

+15.40

FTT.TO vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTT.TO and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTT.TO vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTT.TO drawdown since its inception was -68.67%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -83.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTT.TO and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTT.TOPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.67%

-83.57%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.67%

-39.63%

+21.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.50%

-41.05%

+16.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.10%

-77.89%

+38.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.81%

-38.41%

+27.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.55%

-39.52%

+19.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

22.11%

-16.91%

Volatility

FTT.TO vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Finning International Inc. (FTT.TO) is 13.80%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 16.93%. This indicates that FTT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTT.TOPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.80%

16.93%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.31%

38.57%

-10.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.48%

50.96%

-15.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.59%

65.41%

-32.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.83%

69.83%

-38.00%

Dividends

FTT.TO vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

FTT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTT.TO
Finning International Inc.
1.28%1.59%2.82%2.57%2.77%2.70%3.03%3.22%3.32%2.35%2.78%3.88%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FTT.TO vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Finning International Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.50B
1.63B
(FTT.TO) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FTT.TO values in CAD, PLTR values in USD

FTT.TO vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Finning International Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
23.4%
86.8%
Portfolio components
FTT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Finning International Inc. reported a gross profit of 586.00M and revenue of 2.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

FTT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Finning International Inc. reported an operating income of 187.00M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

FTT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Finning International Inc. reported a net income of 121.00M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTT.TO and PLTR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTT.TO and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer