FTSM vs. VBIL
FTSM (First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF) and VBIL (Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. FTSM is actively managed, while VBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, FTSM returned 4.15% vs 3.93% for VBIL. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTSM charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VBIL.
Performance
FTSM vs. VBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTSM having a 1.49% return and VBIL slightly higher at 1.51%.
FTSM
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
VBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSM vs. VBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF | 1.49% | 4.16% |
VBIL Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF | 1.51% | 3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTSM and VBIL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTSM vs. VBIL — Risk / Return Rank
FTSM
VBIL
FTSM vs. VBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTSM | VBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -18.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.37 | 21.07 | -16.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 35.72 | 42.54 | -6.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 178.37 | 531.60 | -353.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTSM | VBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.77 | 15.14 | -6.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.96 | 13.45 | -11.49 |
Drawdowns
FTSM vs. VBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTSM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, which is greater than VBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSM and VBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTSM | VBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -0.09% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.12% | -0.09% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -0.00% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.01% | +0.01% |
Volatility
FTSM vs. VBIL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) has a higher volatility of 0.16% compared to Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that FTSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTSM | VBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.16% | 0.06% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.35% | 0.16% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48% | 0.26% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.49% | 0.30% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.88% | 0.30% | +0.58% |
FTSM vs. VBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTSM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIL's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTSM vs. VBIL - Dividend Comparison
FTSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than VBIL's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF | 4.16% | 4.28% | 4.91% | 4.62% | 1.62% | 0.39% | 1.20% | 2.38% | 2.14% | 1.49% | 1.03% | 0.48% |
VBIL Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF | 3.65% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTSM and VBIL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTSM has higher volatility (0.16%) compared to VBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSM dropped -4.12% vs VBIL's -0.09%.
On 1-year performance, FTSM leads with 4.15% vs 3.93% for VBIL. On fees, VBIL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTSM has performed better with a 4.15% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBIL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for FTSM.
FTSM has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 3.65% for VBIL.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for FTSM and 0.07% for VBIL.
VBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.14 vs 8.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTSM and VBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer