FTSM vs. UYLD
FTSM (First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF) and UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTSM returned 4.84%/yr vs 5.89%/yr for UYLD. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTSM charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for UYLD.
Performance
FTSM vs. UYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTSM achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than UYLD's 1.91% return.
FTSM
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.54%
UYLD
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSM vs. UYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF | 1.43% | 4.66% | 5.22% | 5.12% | 0.89% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 1.91% | 5.36% | 6.10% | 6.90% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTSM and UYLD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022 | 0.37 |
The correlation between FTSM and UYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTSM vs. UYLD — Risk / Return Rank
FTSM
UYLD
FTSM vs. UYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTSM | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.37 | 4.35 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 35.73 | 38.06 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 177.67 | 225.76 | -48.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTSM | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.78 | 8.00 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.96 | 5.98 | -4.03 |
Drawdowns
FTSM vs. UYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTSM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, which is greater than UYLD's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSM and UYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTSM | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -0.54% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.12% | -0.14% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.15% | -0.54% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.01% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -0.03% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Volatility
FTSM vs. UYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) is 0.16%, while Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) has a volatility of 0.38%. This indicates that FTSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTSM | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.16% | 0.38% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.35% | 0.50% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48% | 0.65% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.49% | 1.00% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.88% | 1.00% | -0.12% |
FTSM vs. UYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTSM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than UYLD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTSM vs. UYLD - Dividend Comparison
FTSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than UYLD's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF | 4.16% | 4.28% | 4.91% | 4.62% | 1.62% | 0.39% | 1.20% | 2.38% | 2.14% | 1.49% | 1.03% | 0.48% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 5.03% | 5.07% | 4.97% | 5.92% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTSM and UYLD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UYLD has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to FTSM (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSM dropped -4.12% vs UYLD's -0.54%.
On 3-year performance, UYLD leads with 5.89% vs 4.84% for FTSM. On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FTSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UYLD has performed better with a 5.89% return vs 4.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for FTSM.
UYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 4.16% for FTSM.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for FTSM and 0.29% for UYLD.
FTSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.78 vs 8.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTSM and UYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer