FTSM vs. QCLN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FTSM (First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FTSM is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by First Trust, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. FTSM is actively managed, while QCLN is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTSM returned 2.55%/yr vs 17.14%/yr for QCLN. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTSM charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.

Performance

FTSM vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSM achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 52.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FTSM has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 2.55%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 17.14% annualized return.

FTSM

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.84%
• 1Y: 4.15%
• 3Y*: 4.86%
• 5Y*: 3.46%
• 10Y*: 2.55%

QCLN

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 13.54%
• YTD: 52.00%
• 6M: 46.53%
• 1Y: 117.87%
• 3Y*: 12.00%
• 5Y*: 2.04%
• 10Y*: 17.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTSM vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF	1.49%	4.66%	5.22%	5.12%	1.02%	-0.01%	1.12%	2.82%	1.94%	1.57%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	52.00%	31.81%	-18.86%	-10.02%	-30.37%	-3.21%	184.00%	42.65%	-12.38%	32.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FTSM and QCLN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2014	0.02

The correlation between FTSM and QCLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTSM vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTSM	QCLN
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	9.4%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	13.2%
Financial Services	-	1.9%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	30.2%
Technology	-	20.8%
Utilities	-	13.2%

Return for Risk

FTSM vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSM

FTSM Risk / Return Rank: 99
FTSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Martin Ratio Rank: 99

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 89
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSM vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTSM	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.77	3.42	+5.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	20.68	3.81	+16.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.37	1.47	+2.90
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	35.72	7.48	+28.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	178.37	25.77	+152.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTSM vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSM Sharpe Ratio is 8.77, which is higher than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSM and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTSM	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.77	3.42	+5.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	7.04	0.05	+6.98
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.91	0.49	+2.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.96	0.20	+1.76

Drawdowns

FTSM vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSM and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTSM	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-76.18%	+72.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.12%	-15.86%	+15.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.15%	-56.08%	+55.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.65%	-69.49%	+68.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.12%	-71.73%	+67.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-21.47%	+21.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-43.44%	+43.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	4.59%	-4.57%

Volatility

FTSM vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) is 0.16%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 12.57%. This indicates that FTSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTSM	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.16%	12.57%	-12.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.35%	26.03%	-25.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48%	34.68%	-34.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.49%	37.96%	-37.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.88%	34.90%	-34.02%

FTSM vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTSM vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

FTSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF	4.16%	4.28%	4.91%	4.62%	1.62%	0.39%	1.20%	2.38%	2.14%	1.49%	1.03%	0.48%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.15%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTSM and QCLN in my portfolio?

FTSM and QCLN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTSM or QCLN?

QCLN has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to FTSM (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSM dropped -4.12% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

Which ETF is better, FTSM or QCLN?

On 10-year performance, QCLN leads with 17.14% vs 2.55% for FTSM. On fees, FTSM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, FTSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTSM or QCLN?

Over the 10-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 17.14% return vs 2.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTSM or QCLN?

FTSM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTSM or QCLN?

FTSM has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.

What is the main difference between FTSM and QCLN?

FTSM is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for FTSM and 0.60% for QCLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.77 vs 3.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.