FTSM vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FTSM (First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTSM is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by First Trust, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTSM returned 4.83%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for PIT. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. FTSM charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

FTSM vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSM achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.

FTSM

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 4.09%
• 3Y*: 4.83%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: 2.57%

PIT

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -10.60%
• YTD: 27.31%
• 6M: 26.74%
• 1Y: 38.33%
• 3Y*: 19.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTSM vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF	1.59%	4.66%	5.22%	5.12%	0.12%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	27.31%	21.63%	6.77%	-4.54%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FTSM and PIT is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022	-0.09

The correlation between FTSM and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.08 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FTSM vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSM

FTSM Risk / Return Rank: 99
FTSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSM vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTSM	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.47	1.78	+6.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	19.49	2.32	+17.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.15	1.32	+2.83
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	35.13	2.74	+32.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	172.78	10.88	+161.90

FTSM vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSM Sharpe Ratio is 8.47, which is higher than the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSM and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTSM vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSM and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTSM	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-14.05%	+9.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.12%	-14.05%	+13.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.15%	-14.05%	+13.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-14.05%	+14.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-4.07%	+3.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	3.59%	-3.57%

Volatility

FTSM vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) is 0.17%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that FTSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTSM	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.17%	4.67%	-4.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.37%	19.36%	-18.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49%	21.66%	-21.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.50%	17.50%	-17.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.88%	17.50%	-16.62%

FTSM vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTSM vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

FTSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than PIT's 7.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF	4.15%	4.28%	4.91%	4.62%	1.62%	0.39%	1.20%	2.38%	2.14%	1.49%	1.03%	0.48%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	7.00%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTSM and PIT in my portfolio?

FTSM and PIT have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTSM or PIT?

PIT has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to FTSM (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSM dropped -4.12% vs PIT's -14.05%.

Which ETF is better, FTSM or PIT?

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 19.51% vs 4.83% for FTSM. On fees, FTSM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, FTSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTSM or PIT?

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTSM or PIT?

FTSM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTSM or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 4.15% for FTSM.

What is the main difference between FTSM and PIT?

FTSM is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for FTSM and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.47 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.