PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTSL vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTSL vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSL achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 28.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FTSL has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 4.44%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.14% annualized return.


FTSL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.65%
6M
0.98%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
7.36%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
4.44%

TDIV

1D
-1.40%
1M
12.56%
YTD
28.74%
6M
26.30%
1Y
50.88%
3Y*
33.15%
5Y*
18.96%
10Y*
19.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTSL vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTSL
First Trust Senior Loan Fund
0.65%5.98%8.27%11.58%-2.50%3.94%2.99%10.11%-1.30%2.59%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
28.74%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FTSL and TDIV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2013

0.34

The correlation between FTSL and TDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTSL vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTSL
TDIV

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

85.0%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

FTSL
100.0%
TDIV

-

Communication Services

FTSL

-

TDIV
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FTSL

-

TDIV

-

Consumer Defensive

FTSL

-

TDIV

-

Energy

FTSL

-

TDIV

-

Financial Services

FTSL

-

TDIV

-

Healthcare

FTSL

-

TDIV

-

Industrials

FTSL

-

TDIV
1.6%

Real Estate

FTSL

-

TDIV

-

Technology

FTSL

-

TDIV
85.0%

Utilities

FTSL

-

TDIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTSL vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSL
FTSL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FTSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSL vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTSLTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.46

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

4.76

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

14.81

-7.50

FTSL vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSL and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTSLTDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.77

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.51

0.92

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.92

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.87

-0.02

Drawdowns

FTSL vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSL drawdown since its inception was -22.67%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSL and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTSLTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.67%

-31.97%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.33%

-10.74%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-23.00%

+20.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.96%

-31.97%

+25.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.67%

-31.97%

+9.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.17%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-4.84%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

3.45%

-2.82%

Volatility

FTSL vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) is 0.36%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that FTSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTSLTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

7.12%

-6.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.95%

13.98%

-12.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11%

18.49%

-16.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.35%

20.68%

-17.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.18%

20.85%

-15.67%

FTSL vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSL has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTSL vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

FTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, more than TDIV's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSL
First Trust Senior Loan Fund
6.46%6.59%7.56%7.59%4.77%3.17%3.48%4.44%4.29%3.64%3.70%3.95%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.13%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTSL and TDIV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to FTSL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSL dropped -22.67% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 19.14% vs 4.44% for FTSL. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FTSL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 19.14% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FTSL.

FTSL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 1.13% for TDIV.

FTSL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TDIV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for FTSL and 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTSL and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer