FTSL vs. SCHP
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP).
FTSL and SCHP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTSL is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on May 1, 2013. SCHP is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010.
Performance
FTSL vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTSL vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | -0.69% | 5.98% | 8.27% | 11.58% | -2.50% | 3.94% | 2.99% | 10.11% | -1.30% | 2.59% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.37% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTSL achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than SCHP's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FTSL has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 4.50%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.56% annualized return.
FTSL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.50%
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTSL vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTSL has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTSL vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
FTSL
SCHP
FTSL vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTSL | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 0.71 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 0.98 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.13 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 1.03 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 3.07 | +4.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTSL | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 0.71 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.46 | 0.22 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.46 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.50 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTSL and SCHP is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FTSL vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
FTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than SCHP's 3.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 6.58% | 6.59% | 7.56% | 7.59% | 4.77% | 3.17% | 3.48% | 4.44% | 4.29% | 3.64% | 3.70% | 3.95% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.72% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Drawdowns
FTSL vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTSL drawdown since its inception was -22.67%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSL and SCHP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTSL | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.67% | -14.26% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.33% | -2.78% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.96% | -14.26% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.67% | -14.26% | -8.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -1.35% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -3.97% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 0.94% | -0.29% |
Volatility
FTSL vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) have volatilities of 1.36% and 1.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTSL | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 1.36% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.91% | 2.22% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11% | 4.04% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.36% | 6.13% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.19% | 5.60% | -0.41% |