PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTSD vs. MTGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTSD vs. MTGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) and WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSD achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than MTGP's 0.21% return.


FTSD

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.30%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*
2.05%

MTGP

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.15%
1Y
6.02%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTSD vs. MTGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FTSD
Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF
0.80%5.66%5.20%4.84%-3.13%-0.90%3.13%0.12%
MTGP
WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund
0.21%7.57%2.48%3.96%-11.29%-0.64%4.91%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FTSD and MTGP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019

0.50

The correlation between FTSD and MTGP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTSD vs. MTGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSD
FTSD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FTSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MTGP
MTGP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MTGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MTGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTGP Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSD vs. MTGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) and WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTSDMTGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.24

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.59

2.39

+7.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.36

6.36

+32.00

FTSD vs. MTGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the MTGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSD and MTGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTSDMTGPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

1.27

+2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.33

0.05

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.18

+0.87

Drawdowns

FTSD vs. MTGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSD drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, smaller than the maximum MTGP drawdown of -16.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSD and MTGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTSDMTGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-16.63%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.45%

-2.53%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.93%

-6.46%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.04%

-16.63%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-1.53%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-5.11%

+4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

0.95%

-0.84%

Volatility

FTSD vs. MTGP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) is 0.51%, while WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that FTSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTSDMTGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

1.30%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

3.09%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31%

4.78%

-3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.85%

5.79%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.79%

5.25%

-3.46%

FTSD vs. MTGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MTGP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTSD vs. MTGP - Dividend Comparison

FTSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than MTGP's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSD
Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF
4.50%4.67%4.75%4.14%1.73%1.01%1.54%2.90%2.63%2.24%1.92%1.52%
MTGP
WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund
4.32%4.19%4.05%3.02%2.47%1.64%2.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTSD and MTGP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTGP has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to FTSD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSD dropped -5.32% vs MTGP's -16.63%.

On 5-year performance, FTSD leads with 2.46% vs 0.29% for MTGP. On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTSD has performed better with a 2.46% return vs 0.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MTGP.

FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 4.32% for MTGP.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FTSD and 0.45% for MTGP.

FTSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTSD and MTGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer