FTRI vs. CSHP
FTRI (First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTRI is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. FTRI is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, FTRI returned 27.35% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTRI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
FTRI vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTRI achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.63% return.
FTRI
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
CSHP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTRI vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 10.97% | 33.62% | -8.02% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.63% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTRI and CSHP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024 | 0.04 |
FTRI vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTRI
CSHP
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Basic Materials
FTRI
CSHP
-
Utilities
FTRI
CSHP
-
Energy
FTRI
CSHP
-
Consumer Defensive
FTRI
CSHP
-
Real Estate
FTRI
CSHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTRI
CSHP
-
Communication Services
FTRI
-
CSHP
-
Financial Services
FTRI
-
CSHP
Healthcare
FTRI
-
CSHP
-
Industrials
FTRI
-
CSHP
-
Technology
FTRI
-
CSHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTRI vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
FTRI
CSHP
FTRI vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTRI | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 11.91 | -10.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 31.26 | -29.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 7.44 | -6.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 65.71 | -63.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | 432.16 | -425.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTRI | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 11.91 | -10.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 10.75 | -10.27 |
Drawdowns
FTRI vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTRI drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRI and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTRI | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.82% | -0.08% | -43.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -0.06% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.02% | 0.00% | -9.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -0.00% | -8.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 0.01% | +4.13% |
Volatility
FTRI vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that FTRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTRI | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 0.07% | +5.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.10% | 0.24% | +13.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 0.33% | +16.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 0.40% | +20.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 0.40% | +21.63% |
FTRI vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTRI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTRI vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
FTRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.92% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 2.33% | 2.35% | 4.29% | 6.56% | 8.37% | 6.58% | 3.64% | 6.25% | 4.24% | 3.60% | 2.96% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTRI and CSHP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTRI has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRI dropped -43.82% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, FTRI leads with 27.35% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTRI has performed better with a 27.35% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTRI.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 2.33% for FTRI.
FTRI is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTRI and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTRI and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer