PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTRFX vs. FDTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTRFX vs. FDTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund (FTRFX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRFX achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than FDTRX's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRFX has underperformed FDTRX with an annualized return of 1.53%, while FDTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.87% annualized return.


FTRFX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.17%
6M
-1.14%
YTD
-1.12%
1Y
2.59%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
-0.79%
10Y*
1.53%
ALL TIME*
4.23%

FDTRX

1D
4.48%
1M
-5.20%
6M
2.97%
YTD
1.72%
1Y
9.88%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
16.87%
ALL TIME*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FTRFX vs. FDTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTRFX
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund
-1.12%7.28%1.02%4.23%-13.31%-0.47%9.19%9.42%-1.14%4.10%
FDTRX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6
1.72%18.97%31.01%44.92%-40.07%12.90%58.22%36.84%3.22%39.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FTRFX and FDTRX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013

0.05

Over the past year, FTRFX and FDTRX have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTRFX vs. FDTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTRFX
FTRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FTRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTRX
FDTRX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FDTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTRFX vs. FDTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund (FTRFX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTRFXFDTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.07

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.38

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.40

1.10

+1.30

FTRFX vs. FDTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the FDTRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRFX and FDTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTRFX vs. FDTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRFX drawdown since its inception was -17.95%, smaller than the maximum FDTRX drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRFX and FDTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTRFXFDTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.95%

-48.10%

+30.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-20.39%

+17.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.56%

-26.19%

+20.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.95%

-48.10%

+30.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.95%

-48.10%

+30.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.09%

-10.50%

+6.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-9.10%

+6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

7.02%

-5.92%

Volatility

FTRFX vs. FDTRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund (FTRFX) is 1.06%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that FTRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTRFXFDTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

8.76%

-7.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.95%

19.68%

-16.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94%

23.82%

-19.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

26.75%

-20.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.79%

24.87%

-20.08%

FTRFX vs. FDTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRFX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTRX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTRFX vs. FDTRX - Dividend Comparison

FTRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than FDTRX's 10.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTRX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6
10.21%10.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.36%0.00%0.71%2.80%1.71%3.44%2.40%
FTRFX
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund
3.93%4.22%3.48%2.95%2.25%3.17%4.36%3.08%3.19%2.91%3.33%3.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTRFX and FDTRX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTRX has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to FTRFX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRFX dropped -17.95% vs FDTRX's -48.10%.

FTRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTRFX and FDTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer