PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTRBX vs. FHYSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTRBX vs. FHYSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares (FTRBX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRBX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than FHYSX's 1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRBX has underperformed FHYSX with an annualized return of 2.26%, while FHYSX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.32% annualized return.


FTRBX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.70%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.56%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
2.26%

FHYSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.70%
YTD
1.36%
6M
2.23%
1Y
7.21%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*
5.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTRBX vs. FHYSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTRBX
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares
0.15%7.60%2.03%5.20%-13.13%-0.21%9.52%9.75%-0.85%4.41%
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
1.36%9.14%6.42%12.77%-13.16%4.49%6.08%15.14%-2.16%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FTRBX and FHYSX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009

0.28

The correlation between FTRBX and FHYSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.54 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTRBX vs. FHYSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTRBX
FTRBX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FTRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FHYSX
FHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTRBX vs. FHYSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares (FTRBX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTRBXFHYSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

2.13

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

3.75

-1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.54

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.96

-0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.26

15.43

-9.17

FTRBX vs. FHYSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the FHYSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRBX and FHYSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTRBXFHYSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.13

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.67

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.93

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.88

+0.20

Drawdowns

FTRBX vs. FHYSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRBX drawdown since its inception was -17.49%, smaller than the maximum FHYSX drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRBX and FHYSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTRBXFHYSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.49%

-21.45%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-2.44%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.21%

-3.64%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.49%

-16.93%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.49%

-21.45%

+3.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

0.00%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-2.58%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.47%

+0.43%

Volatility

FTRBX vs. FHYSX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares (FTRBX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) at 0.96%. This indicates that FTRBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHYSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTRBXFHYSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

0.96%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

2.61%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

3.40%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.89%

5.24%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.80%

5.77%

-0.97%

FTRBX vs. FHYSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRBX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FHYSX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTRBX vs. FHYSX - Dividend Comparison

FTRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than FHYSX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
6.29%6.28%5.84%5.30%5.27%4.54%5.74%6.18%6.61%6.98%6.45%8.45%
FTRBX
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares
4.54%4.52%4.47%3.84%2.47%3.43%4.66%3.38%3.49%3.21%3.35%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTRBX and FHYSX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTRBX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to FHYSX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRBX dropped -17.49% vs FHYSX's -21.45%.

FHYSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTRBX and FHYSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer