PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTRB vs. IMTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FTRB vs. IMTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FTRB vs. IMTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FTRB
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF
-0.17%7.60%2.56%
IMTB
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
-0.09%8.88%3.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRB achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than IMTB's -0.09% return.


FTRB

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
0.92%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IMTB

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
1.16%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FTRB vs. IMTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FTRB vs. IMTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTRB
FTRB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IMTB
IMTB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IMTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTRB vs. IMTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTRBIMTBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.20

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

1.73

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.02

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.29

6.33

-1.05

FTRB vs. IMTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the IMTB Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRB and IMTB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTRBIMTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.20

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.37

+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between FTRB and IMTB is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FTRB vs. IMTB - Dividend Comparison

FTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, which matches IMTB's 4.47% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTRB
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF
4.44%4.46%4.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IMTB
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
4.47%4.40%4.42%4.13%2.90%2.49%2.63%2.91%3.04%2.75%0.40%

Drawdowns

FTRB vs. IMTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRB drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum IMTB drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRB and IMTB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FTRBIMTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-18.15%

+13.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-2.77%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-1.80%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-4.18%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.88%

+0.03%

Volatility

FTRB vs. IMTB - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) have volatilities of 1.67% and 1.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FTRBIMTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

1.73%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

2.77%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

4.40%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.61%

6.24%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.61%

5.20%

-0.59%