FTQGX vs. FSST
FTQGX (Fidelity Focused Stock Fund) and FSST (Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF) are both funds - FTQGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FSST is a Sustainable fund tracking the Russell 3000. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTQGX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FSST.
Performance
FTQGX vs. FSST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FTQGX
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 10.43%
- YTD
- 26.34%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 52.54%
- 3Y*
- 30.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.78%
- 10Y*
- 19.07%
FSST
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTQGX vs. FSST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund | 26.34% | 13.65% | 36.95% | 28.94% | -26.68% | 13.13% |
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 15.40% | 21.40% | 25.49% | -18.30% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTQGX and FSST is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FTQGX and FSST has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTQGX vs. FSST — Risk / Return Rank
FTQGX
FSST
FTQGX vs. FSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) and Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTQGX | FSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTQGX | FSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FTQGX vs. FSST - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTQGX | FSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.19% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | — | — |
Volatility
FTQGX vs. FSST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTQGX | FSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.67% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | — | — |
FTQGX vs. FSST - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTQGX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FSST's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTQGX vs. FSST - Dividend Comparison
FTQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than FSST's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 2.01% | 0.68% | 1.00% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund | 9.85% | 12.44% | 9.94% | 0.61% | 7.96% | 13.53% | 11.41% | 5.07% | 14.71% | 5.89% | 1.08% | 5.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTQGX and FSST have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FTQGX and FSST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer