FTNJ vs. ERX
FTNJ (Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FTNJ is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while ERX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index (300%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. FTNJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for ERX.
Performance
FTNJ vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTNJ achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 66.93% return.
FTNJ
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 66.93%
- 6M
- 59.74%
- 1Y
- 90.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.69%
- 5Y*
- 28.75%
- 10Y*
- -8.79%
FTNJ vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTNJ Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF | 1.80% | 0.34% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 66.93% | -1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTNJ and ERX is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTNJ vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
FTNJ
ERX
FTNJ vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF (FTNJ) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTNJ | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | -0.09 | +1.26 |
Drawdowns
FTNJ vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTNJ drawdown since its inception was -2.72%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTNJ and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTNJ | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -99.54% | +96.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -91.57% | +91.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -67.02% | +66.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.57% | — |
Volatility
FTNJ vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTNJ | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 41.14% | -37.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 51.98% | -48.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 69.18% | -65.83% |
FTNJ vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTNJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTNJ vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
FTNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than ERX's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.61% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
FTNJ Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF | 1.98% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTNJ and ERX have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTNJ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTNJ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
FTNJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.61% for ERX.
FTNJ is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ERX is Leveraged Equities. FTNJ tracks Actively Managed, while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTNJ and 1.09% for ERX.
Find the right allocation for FTNJ and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer