FTMSX vs. DTSVX
FTMSX (Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund) and DTSVX (Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FTMSX returned 0.33%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for DTSVX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FTMSX charges 2.30%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for DTSVX.
Performance
FTMSX vs. DTSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMSX achieves a 22.38% return, which is significantly lower than DTSVX's 25.18% return.
FTMSX
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -6.49%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- YTD
- 22.38%
- 1Y
- 36.98%
- 3Y*
- 7.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.55%
DTSVX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- YTD
- 25.18%
- 1Y
- 42.27%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FTMSX vs. DTSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMSX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund | 22.38% | 0.30% | 3.88% | 13.11% | -31.07% | 37.45% | 15.58% | 17.82% |
DTSVX Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio | 25.18% | 10.47% | 7.63% | 17.45% | -10.31% | 32.04% | 0.45% | 20.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMSX and DTSVX is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FTMSX and DTSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMSX vs. DTSVX — Risk / Return Rank
FTMSX
DTSVX
FTMSX vs. DTSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX) and Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio (DTSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTMSX | DTSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.37 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 3.96 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 13.55 | -6.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTMSX vs. DTSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMSX drawdown since its inception was -53.12%, smaller than the maximum DTSVX drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMSX and DTSVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMSX | DTSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.12% | -62.29% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.52% | -9.55% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.01% | -26.88% | -8.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.67% | -26.88% | -21.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.11% | -1.31% | -7.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.97% | -10.25% | -11.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 2.80% | +1.98% |
Volatility
FTMSX vs. DTSVX - Volatility Comparison
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio (DTSVX) at 3.88%. This indicates that FTMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMSX | DTSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 3.88% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.97% | 11.79% | +7.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.16% | 17.66% | +8.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.11% | 21.13% | +6.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.47% | 23.36% | +7.11% |
FTMSX vs. DTSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMSX has a 2.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DTSVX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMSX vs. DTSVX - Dividend Comparison
FTMSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DTSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTSVX Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio | 8.75% | 10.95% | 9.03% | 3.92% | 11.16% | 0.93% | 2.30% | 0.66% | 6.28% | 12.18% | 2.20% | 5.98% |
FTMSX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.27% | 0.37% | 4.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMSX and DTSVX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTMSX has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to DTSVX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTMSX dropped -53.12% vs DTSVX's -62.29%.
DTSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTMSX and DTSVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer