FTMN vs. VTEB
FTMN (Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF) and VTEB (Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - FTMN tracks the Actively Managed while VTEB tracks the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTMN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTEB.
Performance
FTMN vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTMN having a 1.52% return and VTEB slightly lower at 1.46%.
FTMN
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTEB
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 7.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.88%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
FTMN vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF | 1.52% | 0.61% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.46% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMN and VTEB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMN vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank
FTMN
VTEB
FTMN vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMN | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.47 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
FTMN vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMN drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum VTEB drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMN and VTEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMN | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -17.00% | +13.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.52% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -2.33% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.76% | — |
Volatility
FTMN vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMN | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 2.72% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 3.90% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 5.26% | -1.12% |
FTMN vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMN vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison
FTMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than VTEB's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF | 1.83% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.35% | 3.29% | 3.14% | 2.79% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 2.30% | 2.25% | 1.96% | 1.66% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMN and VTEB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMN.
VTEB has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 1.83% for FTMN.
FTMN tracks Actively Managed, while VTEB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMN and 0.03% for VTEB.
Find the right allocation for FTMN and VTEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer