FTMN vs. PBDC
FTMN (Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF) and PBDC (Putnam BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMN is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while PBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. FTMN is passively managed, while PBDC is actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMN charges 0.35%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for PBDC.
Performance
FTMN vs. PBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMN achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than PBDC's -11.42% return.
FTMN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBDC
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- -11.42%
- 6M
- -9.25%
- 1Y
- -11.33%
- 3Y*
- 7.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTMN vs. PBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF | 1.81% | 0.27% |
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF | -11.42% | 3.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMN and PBDC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMN vs. PBDC — Risk / Return Rank
FTMN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PBDC
FTMN vs. PBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTMN | PBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.91 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.98 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTMN vs. PBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMN drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum PBDC drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMN and PBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMN | PBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -20.47% | +17.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -18.74% | +18.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -4.83% | +4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.58% | — |
Volatility
FTMN vs. PBDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMN | PBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 18.66% | -14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 17.05% | -12.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 17.05% | -12.90% |
FTMN vs. PBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PBDC's 13.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMN vs. PBDC - Dividend Comparison
FTMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than PBDC's 11.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF | 1.83% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF | 11.91% | 10.53% | 9.29% | 9.86% | 3.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMN and PBDC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTMN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTMN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 13.49% for PBDC.
PBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.91%, compared with 1.83% for FTMN.
FTMN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PBDC is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMN and 13.49% for PBDC.
Find the right allocation for FTMN and PBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer