FTMN vs. HYMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTMN (Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF) and HYMB (SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - FTMN tracks the Actively Managed while HYMB tracks the Bloomberg Municipal Yield. Both are passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

FTMN vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMN achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 2.87% return.

FTMN

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYMB

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: 7.43%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: 0.42%
• 10Y*: 2.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMN vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF	1.52%	0.61%
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF	2.87%	0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FTMN and HYMB is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

FTMN vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMB

HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 53
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTMN vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTMN	HYMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.45	+0.49

Drawdowns

FTMN vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMN drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMN and HYMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTMN	HYMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.10%	-29.57%	+26.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.11%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.44%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.15%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.04%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-3.81%	+3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTMN	HYMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.35%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.14%	4.05%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.14%	6.66%	-2.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.14%	11.36%	-7.22%

FTMN vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FTMN and HYMB have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

FTMN vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison

FTMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than HYMB's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF	1.83%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF	4.54%	4.55%	4.29%	4.07%	3.77%	3.19%	3.55%	3.95%	4.03%	3.78%	4.08%	4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTMN and HYMB in my portfolio?

FTMN and HYMB have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTMN or HYMB?

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTMN or HYMB?

FTMN and HYMB have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTMN or HYMB?

HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 1.83% for FTMN.

What is the main difference between FTMN and HYMB?

FTMN tracks Actively Managed, while HYMB tracks Bloomberg Municipal Yield. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street.