FTMN vs. EZBC
FTMN (Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMN is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while EZBC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.
Performance
FTMN vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMN achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -25.36% return.
FTMN
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -18.42%
- YTD
- -25.36%
- 6M
- -29.82%
- 1Y
- -38.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTMN vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF | 1.52% | 0.61% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -25.36% | -17.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMN and EZBC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMN vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank
FTMN
EZBC
FTMN vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMN | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.30 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
FTMN vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMN drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMN and EZBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMN | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -49.37% | +46.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -48.04% | +47.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -16.01% | +15.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.42% | — |
Volatility
FTMN vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMN | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 43.67% | -39.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 50.06% | -45.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 50.06% | -45.92% |
FTMN vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMN vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison
FTMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTMN Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF | 1.83% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMN and EZBC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMN.
FTMN has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.
FTMN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while EZBC is Cryptocurrency. FTMN tracks Actively Managed, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMN and 0.19% for EZBC.
Find the right allocation for FTMN and EZBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer