FTMKX vs. VMMSX
FTMKX (Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M) and VMMSX (Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FTMKX returned 12.51%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for VMMSX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTMKX charges 1.61%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for VMMSX.
Performance
FTMKX vs. VMMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMKX achieves a 31.17% return, which is significantly higher than VMMSX's 17.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FTMKX has outperformed VMMSX with an annualized return of 12.51%, while VMMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.41% annualized return.
FTMKX
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 31.17%
- 6M
- 32.88%
- 1Y
- 63.93%
- 3Y*
- 25.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.51%
VMMSX
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 17.85%
- 6M
- 19.34%
- 1Y
- 43.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
FTMKX vs. VMMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M | 31.17% | 39.38% | 8.73% | 7.84% | -20.29% | -3.19% | 29.65% | 28.95% | -18.56% | 46.33% |
VMMSX Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund | 17.85% | 35.68% | 5.91% | 10.58% | -18.15% | -1.40% | 15.79% | 21.42% | -12.53% | 32.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMKX and VMMSX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2011 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FTMKX and VMMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMKX vs. VMMSX — Risk / Return Rank
FTMKX
VMMSX
FTMKX vs. VMMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTMKX | VMMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.44 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 3.14 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.49 | 11.95 | +5.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTMKX vs. VMMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMKX drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, which is greater than VMMSX's maximum drawdown of -39.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMKX and VMMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMKX | VMMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.17% | -39.28% | -30.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -13.46% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.94% | -18.37% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.01% | -36.84% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | -38.82% | -3.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -2.56% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.95% | -13.37% | -7.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 3.53% | +0.04% |
Volatility
FTMKX vs. VMMSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) at 7.81%. This indicates that FTMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMKX | VMMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 7.81% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.92% | 15.48% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.06% | 17.87% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 18.01% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 18.47% | +0.55% |
FTMKX vs. VMMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMKX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VMMSX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMKX vs. VMMSX - Dividend Comparison
FTMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VMMSX's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M | 0.79% | 1.04% | 0.78% | 0.98% | 0.47% | 4.58% | 1.62% | 10.48% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMMSX Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund | 1.97% | 2.32% | 3.33% | 3.05% | 3.71% | 6.80% | 1.04% | 2.04% | 2.53% | 1.54% | 1.44% | 1.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FTMKX and VMMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FTMKX has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to VMMSX (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTMKX dropped -70.17% vs VMMSX's -39.28%.
FTMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTMKX and VMMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer