PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTMKX vs. ESCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTMKX vs. ESCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMKX achieves a 20.17% return, which is significantly higher than ESCIX's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FTMKX has outperformed ESCIX with an annualized return of 10.89%, while ESCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.13% annualized return.


FTMKX

1D
4.16%
1M
-2.87%
6M
8.70%
YTD
20.17%
1Y
41.50%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
10.89%
ALL TIME*
8.74%

ESCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.50%
YTD
8.91%
1Y
23.63%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
9.13%
ALL TIME*
6.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FTMKX vs. ESCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M
20.17%39.38%8.73%7.84%-20.29%-3.19%29.65%28.95%-18.56%46.33%
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
8.91%26.07%3.55%19.64%-24.45%11.93%43.41%15.24%-22.01%28.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FTMKX and ESCIX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2011

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FTMKX and ESCIX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTMKX vs. ESCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTMKX
FTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ESCIX
ESCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ESCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ESCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTMKX vs. ESCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTMKXESCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.53

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

3.92

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

17.72

-9.06

FTMKX vs. ESCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the ESCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTMKX and ESCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTMKX vs. ESCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMKX drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, which is greater than ESCIX's maximum drawdown of -48.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMKX and ESCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTMKXESCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.17%

-48.76%

-21.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-5.70%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.94%

-19.97%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.17%

-36.59%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

-48.76%

+6.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.96%

-0.74%

-9.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-13.21%

-7.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

1.49%

+3.01%

Volatility

FTMKX vs. ESCIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FTMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTMKXESCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

0.00%

+9.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.32%

5.66%

+14.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

10.28%

+12.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

15.57%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

17.48%

+1.71%

FTMKX vs. ESCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMKX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is higher than ESCIX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTMKX vs. ESCIX - Dividend Comparison

FTMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than ESCIX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
0.42%0.91%0.00%0.56%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.11%1.66%1.16%
FTMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M
0.86%1.04%0.78%0.98%0.47%4.58%1.62%10.48%0.00%0.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTMKX and ESCIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTMKX has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to ESCIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTMKX dropped -70.17% vs ESCIX's -48.76%.

ESCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTMKX and ESCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer