FTMH vs. YYYM
FTMH (Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF) and YYYM (Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. FTMH is actively managed, while YYYM is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 2.78%/yr for YYYM.
Performance
FTMH vs. YYYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FTMH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YYYM
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTMH vs. YYYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 1.84% |
YYYM Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMH and YYYM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMH vs. YYYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF (YYYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMH | YYYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.04 | +1.49 |
Drawdowns
FTMH vs. YYYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum YYYM drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and YYYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMH | YYYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -5.24% | +2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.77% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -1.29% | +0.69% |
Volatility
FTMH vs. YYYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMH | YYYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 10.78% | -6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 10.78% | -6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 10.78% | -6.78% |
FTMH vs. YYYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than YYYM's 2.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMH vs. YYYM - Dividend Comparison
FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than YYYM's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 2.71% | 0.86% |
YYYM Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF | 1.21% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMH and YYYM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.78% for YYYM.
FTMH has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 1.21% for YYYM.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 2.78% for YYYM.
Find the right allocation for FTMH and YYYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer