FTMH vs. USCI
FTMH (Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF) and USCI (United States Commodity Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMH is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while USCI is a Commodities fund tracking the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity (TR). FTMH is actively managed, while USCI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. FTMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for USCI.
Performance
FTMH vs. USCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMH achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than USCI's 28.22% return.
FTMH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 28.22%
- 6M
- 26.35%
- 1Y
- 40.33%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
FTMH vs. USCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 3.48% | 0.11% |
USCI United States Commodity Index Fund | 28.22% | -1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMH and USCI is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMH vs. USCI — Risk / Return Rank
FTMH
USCI
FTMH vs. USCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMH | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.30 | +1.23 |
Drawdowns
FTMH vs. USCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum USCI drawdown of -66.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and USCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMH | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -66.41% | +63.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.10% | +3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -29.51% | +28.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.50% | — |
Volatility
FTMH vs. USCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMH | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 16.70% | -12.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 18.44% | -14.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 15.85% | -11.85% |
FTMH vs. USCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USCI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMH vs. USCI - Dividend Comparison
FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while USCI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 2.71% | 0.86% |
USCI United States Commodity Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMH and USCI have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for USCI.
FTMH has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.00% for USCI.
FTMH is categorized as High Yield Muni, while USCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 1.03% for USCI.
Find the right allocation for FTMH and USCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer