FTMH vs. PSCE
FTMH (Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF) and PSCE (Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMH is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while PSCE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index. FTMH is actively managed, while PSCE is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. FTMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCE.
Performance
FTMH vs. PSCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMH achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly lower than PSCE's 29.21% return.
FTMH
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 4.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCE
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- -11.98%
- YTD
- 29.21%
- 6M
- 29.24%
- 1Y
- 43.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- -2.65%
FTMH vs. PSCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 4.09% | -0.43% |
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 29.21% | 0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMH and PSCE is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMH vs. PSCE — Risk / Return Rank
FTMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCE
FTMH vs. PSCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTMH | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTMH vs. PSCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum PSCE drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and PSCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMH | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -96.21% | +93.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -44.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -77.04% | +77.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -58.88% | +58.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.23% | — |
Volatility
FTMH vs. PSCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMH | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 27.38% | -23.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 37.39% | -33.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 43.19% | -39.17% |
FTMH vs. PSCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMH vs. PSCE - Dividend Comparison
FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than PSCE's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 2.69% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 2.34% | 2.39% | 1.70% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.22% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMH and PSCE have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMH.
FTMH has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.34% for PSCE.
FTMH is categorized as High Yield Muni, while PSCE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 0.29% for PSCE.
Find the right allocation for FTMH and PSCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer