FTMH vs. PAAA
FTMH (Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF) and PAAA (PGIM AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMH is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while PAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for PAAA.
Performance
FTMH vs. PAAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMH achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly higher than PAAA's 2.03% return.
FTMH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAAA
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTMH vs. PAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 3.48% | 0.11% |
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF | 2.03% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMH and PAAA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMH vs. PAAA — Risk / Return Rank
FTMH
PAAA
FTMH vs. PAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMH | PAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 10.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 6.78 | -5.25 |
Drawdowns
FTMH vs. PAAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, which is greater than PAAA's maximum drawdown of -1.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and PAAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMH | PAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -1.04% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -0.02% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
FTMH vs. PAAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMH | PAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 0.49% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 0.98% | +3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 0.98% | +3.02% |
FTMH vs. PAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PAAA's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMH vs. PAAA - Dividend Comparison
FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than PAAA's 4.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 2.71% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF | 4.88% | 5.12% | 5.88% | 2.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMH and PAAA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAAA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAAA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMH.
PAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 2.71% for FTMH.
FTMH is categorized as High Yield Muni, while PAAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 0.19% for PAAA.
Find the right allocation for FTMH and PAAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer