FTMH vs. EVYM
FTMH (Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF) and EVYM (Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EVYM.
Performance
FTMH vs. EVYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMH achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly higher than EVYM's 3.30% return.
FTMH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVYM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 3.30%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 10.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTMH vs. EVYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 3.48% | 0.11% |
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF | 3.30% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMH and EVYM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMH vs. EVYM — Risk / Return Rank
FTMH
EVYM
FTMH vs. EVYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMH | EVYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.93 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
FTMH vs. EVYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum EVYM drawdown of -6.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and EVYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMH | EVYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -6.08% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.15% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -1.49% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.73% | — |
Volatility
FTMH vs. EVYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMH | EVYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 3.69% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 6.08% | -2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 6.08% | -2.08% |
FTMH vs. EVYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EVYM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMH vs. EVYM - Dividend Comparison
FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than EVYM's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF | 4.78% | 3.72% |
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 2.71% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMH and EVYM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EVYM.
EVYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 2.71% for FTMH.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 0.40% for EVYM.
Find the right allocation for FTMH and EVYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer