PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTMH vs. EVYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTMH vs. EVYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMH achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly higher than EVYM's 3.30% return.


FTMH

1D
0.00%
1M
1.24%
YTD
3.48%
6M
3.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVYM

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.16%
YTD
3.30%
6M
3.97%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMH vs. EVYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTMH and EVYM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTMH vs. EVYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTMH

EVYM
EVYM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EVYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EVYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTMH vs. EVYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTMH vs. EVYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTMHEVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.93

+0.61

Drawdowns

FTMH vs. EVYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum EVYM drawdown of -6.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and EVYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTMHEVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-6.08%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-1.49%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

Volatility

FTMH vs. EVYM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTMHEVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

3.69%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.00%

6.08%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.00%

6.08%

-2.08%

FTMH vs. EVYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EVYM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTMH vs. EVYM - Dividend Comparison

FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than EVYM's 4.78% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTMH and EVYM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EVYM.

EVYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 2.71% for FTMH.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 0.40% for EVYM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTMH and EVYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer