FTMA vs. USOY
FTMA (Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF) and USOY (Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMA is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while USOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. FTMA is passively managed, while USOY is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. FTMA charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for USOY.
Performance
FTMA vs. USOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMA achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 49.45% return.
FTMA
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USOY
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- 49.45%
- 6M
- 49.95%
- 1Y
- 38.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTMA vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF | 2.00% | 0.54% |
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF | 49.45% | -0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMA and USOY is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | -0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMA vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank
FTMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USOY
FTMA vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTMA | USOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTMA vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMA drawdown since its inception was -2.27%, smaller than the maximum USOY drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMA and USOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMA | USOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -17.46% | +15.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -12.56% | +12.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -6.49% | +6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.58% | — |
Volatility
FTMA vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMA | USOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 27.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 31.15% | -27.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.44% | 26.34% | -22.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.44% | 26.34% | -22.90% |
FTMA vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMA vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison
FTMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than USOY's 61.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF | 1.96% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF | 61.95% | 104.32% | 48.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMA and USOY have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTMA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTMA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.
USOY has the higher dividend yield at 61.95%, compared with 1.96% for FTMA.
FTMA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMA and 1.22% for USOY.
Find the right allocation for FTMA and USOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer