PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTMA vs. USOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTMA vs. USOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMA achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than USOI's 39.25% return.


FTMA

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.00%
6M
2.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USOI

1D
-1.52%
1M
-5.90%
YTD
39.25%
6M
39.95%
1Y
35.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMA vs. USOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTMA and USOI is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTMA vs. USOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


USOI
USOI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
USOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
USOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTMA vs. USOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTMAUSOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

FTMA vs. USOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTMA vs. USOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMA drawdown since its inception was -2.27%, smaller than the maximum USOI drawdown of -19.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMA and USOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTMAUSOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-19.49%

+17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-10.34%

+10.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-7.22%

+6.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

Volatility

FTMA vs. USOI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTMAUSOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

23.02%

-19.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.44%

22.87%

-19.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.44%

22.87%

-19.43%

FTMA vs. USOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USOI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTMA vs. USOI - Dividend Comparison

FTMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than USOI's 39.87% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTMA and USOI have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTMA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTMA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for USOI.

USOI has the higher dividend yield at 39.87%, compared with 1.96% for FTMA.

FTMA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while USOI is Oil & Gas. FTMA tracks Actively Managed, while USOI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ WTI Crude Oil FLOWS 106 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMA and 0.85% for USOI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTMA and USOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer