PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLSX vs. URSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTLSX vs. URSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLSX achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly lower than URSIX's 13.54% return.


FTLSX

1D
0.77%
1M
-0.67%
6M
2.59%
YTD
4.00%
1Y
8.24%
3Y*
7.45%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.37%

URSIX

1D
1.42%
1M
0.56%
6M
9.91%
YTD
13.54%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
10.23%
ALL TIME*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FTLSX vs. URSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
4.00%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%9.04%10.97%-1.40%3.61%
URSIX
USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund
13.54%19.62%13.05%18.22%-15.78%17.70%10.17%20.09%-9.17%8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLSX and URSIX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.71

The correlation between FTLSX and URSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (5 years) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLSX vs. URSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

URSIX
URSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
URSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
URSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
URSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
URSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTLSX vs. URSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTLSXURSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.81

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

12.09

-2.71

FTLSX vs. URSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the URSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLSX and URSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTLSX vs. URSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLSX drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, smaller than the maximum URSIX drawdown of -30.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLSX and URSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLSXURSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-30.33%

+14.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-8.32%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.96%

-14.35%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

-23.85%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.28%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-4.40%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.93%

-1.03%

Volatility

FTLSX vs. URSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) is 1.72%, while USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that FTLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLSXURSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

3.06%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.55%

10.34%

-5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.17%

12.45%

-7.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.57%

14.21%

-8.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.83%

14.52%

-9.69%

FTLSX vs. URSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than URSIX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTLSX vs. URSIX - Dividend Comparison

FTLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than URSIX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.05%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%0.00%0.00%
URSIX
USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund
4.93%5.60%2.55%2.89%10.97%7.07%4.79%5.88%4.77%3.82%3.01%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTLSX and URSIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URSIX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to FTLSX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLSX dropped -15.74% vs URSIX's -30.33%.

URSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLSX and URSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer