PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLSX vs. MURLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTLSX vs. MURLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and Mutual of America 2040 Retirement Fund (MURLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLSX achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly lower than MURLX's 8.54% return.


FTLSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.67%
6M
2.69%
YTD
4.00%
1Y
8.24%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.37%

MURLX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.06%
6M
5.43%
YTD
8.54%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
52.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FTLSX vs. MURLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
4.00%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%9.04%
MURLX
Mutual of America 2040 Retirement Fund
8.54%17.01%13.28%14.86%-15.95%16.84%889.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLSX and MURLX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.61

The correlation between FTLSX and MURLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLSX vs. MURLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MURLX
MURLX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MURLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MURLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MURLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MURLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MURLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTLSX vs. MURLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and Mutual of America 2040 Retirement Fund (MURLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTLSXMURLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.44

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

11.11

-1.64

FTLSX vs. MURLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the MURLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLSX and MURLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTLSX vs. MURLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLSX drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, smaller than the maximum MURLX drawdown of -31.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLSX and MURLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLSXMURLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-31.54%

+15.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-7.75%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.96%

-13.69%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

-23.06%

+7.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.54%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-5.28%

+2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.63%

-0.73%

Volatility

FTLSX vs. MURLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) is 1.68%, while Mutual of America 2040 Retirement Fund (MURLX) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that FTLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MURLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLSXMURLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

2.88%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.55%

8.57%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.16%

11.21%

-6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.56%

16.01%

-10.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

376.68%

-371.86%

FTLSX vs. MURLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MURLX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTLSX vs. MURLX - Dividend Comparison

FTLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than MURLX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.05%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%
MURLX
Mutual of America 2040 Retirement Fund
8.06%8.62%8.02%3.04%11.39%4.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTLSX and MURLX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MURLX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to FTLSX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLSX dropped -15.74% vs MURLX's -31.54%.

MURLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLSX and MURLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer