PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLSX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTLSX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLSX achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 4.11% return.


FTLSX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.40%
YTD
4.89%
6M
5.45%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*

FFGZX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.43%
YTD
4.11%
6M
4.43%
1Y
10.37%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
4.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTLSX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
4.89%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%9.04%10.97%-1.40%3.61%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.11%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%3.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLSX and FFGZX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FTLSX and FFGZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLSX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTLSX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTLSXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

2.58

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.88

3.87

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.52

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.14

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.62

14.09

+0.53

FTLSX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLSX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTLSXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.58

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.63

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.93

+0.03

Drawdowns

FTLSX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLSX drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLSX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLSXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-14.94%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-3.33%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.83%

-4.76%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

-14.94%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-2.27%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.74%

+0.08%

Volatility

FTLSX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.49%. This indicates that FTLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLSXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.49%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.80%

3.34%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.55%

4.02%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.43%

5.08%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.78%

4.43%

+0.35%

FTLSX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTLSX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

FTLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than FFGZX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.22%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.55%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FTLSX and FFGZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTLSX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to FFGZX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLSX dropped -15.74% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLSX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer