PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLS vs. HGER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTLS vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLS achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 29.53% return.


FTLS

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.85%
6M
4.95%
YTD
6.03%
1Y
13.39%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
9.00%

HGER

1D
0.00%
1M
8.95%
6M
20.19%
YTD
29.53%
1Y
40.17%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.26M$8.04M$8.94M
$46.51M$66.72M$45.77M

FTLS vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
6.03%9.09%18.80%16.94%-3.36%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
29.53%20.08%9.25%1.93%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLS and HGER is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.15

The correlation between FTLS and HGER shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLS vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTLS
FTLS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTLS vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTLSHGERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.41

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.87

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.80

10.23

+0.57

FTLS vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLS and HGER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTLS vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLS drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, smaller than the maximum HGER drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLS and HGER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLSHGERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.54%

-23.31%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.79%

-14.04%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

-14.04%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-3.94%

+3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-7.66%

+4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

3.94%

-2.70%

Volatility

FTLS vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) is 2.15%, while Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that FTLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLSHGERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

5.64%

-3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.86%

15.43%

-9.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.54%

17.71%

-9.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.53%

17.67%

-7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.23%

17.67%

-6.44%

FTLS vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTLS has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTLS vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

FTLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than HGER's 5.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
0.88%1.07%1.50%1.49%0.81%0.01%0.44%0.83%0.87%0.43%1.04%0.49%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.47%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTLS and HGER have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HGER has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to FTLS (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLS dropped -20.54% vs HGER's -23.31%.

On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 18.61% vs 13.13% for FTLS. On fees, HGER is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, FTLS has been the lower-risk option at 2.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 13.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HGER is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for FTLS.

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 0.88% for FTLS.

FTLS is categorized as Long-Short, while HGER is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for FTLS and 0.68% for HGER.

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLS and HGER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer