FTLS vs. HECA
FTLS (First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF) and HECA (Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTLS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by First Trust, while HECA is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Hedgeye. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTLS charges 1.60%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for HECA.
Performance
FTLS vs. HECA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTLS achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than HECA's -2.82% return.
FTLS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
HECA
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- -2.82%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTLS vs. HECA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 5.04% | 7.70% |
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | -2.82% | 12.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTLS and HECA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTLS vs. HECA — Risk / Return Rank
FTLS
HECA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTLS vs. HECA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF (HECA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTLS | HECA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.93 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTLS vs. HECA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTLS drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, which is greater than HECA's maximum drawdown of -12.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLS and HECA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTLS | HECA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.54% | -12.82% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -12.82% | +12.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -3.54% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | — | — |
Volatility
FTLS vs. HECA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTLS | HECA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.36% | 12.62% | -4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.57% | 12.62% | -2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.30% | 12.62% | -1.32% |
FTLS vs. HECA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTLS has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HECA's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTLS vs. HECA - Dividend Comparison
FTLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than HECA's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 0.81% | 0.01% | 0.44% | 0.83% | 0.87% | 0.43% | 1.04% | 0.49% |
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | 2.08% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTLS and HECA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HECA is cheaper at 1.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HECA is cheaper with a 1.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.60% for FTLS.
HECA has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.90% for FTLS.
FTLS is categorized as Long-Short, while HECA is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Hedgeye. Their fees differ too: 1.60% for FTLS and 1.02% for HECA.
Find the right allocation for FTLS and HECA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer