PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTKFX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FTKFX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Bond K6 Fund (FTKFX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTKFX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.35% return.


FTKFX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.69%
6M
0.59%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.28%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTKFX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTKFX
Fidelity Total Bond K6 Fund
0.69%7.53%2.36%6.65%-13.23%-0.46%8.75%10.03%-0.75%1.14%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.35%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%9.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FTKFX and ^GSPC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2017

0.07

The correlation between FTKFX and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTKFX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTKFX
FTKFX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FTKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FTKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTKFX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond K6 Fund (FTKFX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTKFX^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.41

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.93

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.24

13.52

-7.28

FTKFX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTKFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTKFX and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTKFX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.24

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.73

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.47

0.00

Drawdowns

FTKFX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTKFX drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTKFX and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTKFX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.81%

-56.78%

+38.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-9.10%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

-18.90%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.81%

-25.43%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.74%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-10.72%

+6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.97%

-1.02%

Volatility

FTKFX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond K6 Fund (FTKFX) is 1.35%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that FTKFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTKFX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

2.93%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

8.99%

-6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

11.89%

-7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.66%

16.90%

-11.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.92%

18.06%

-13.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTKFX and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GSPC has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to FTKFX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTKFX dropped -17.81% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTKFX and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer