PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTISX vs. FISMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTISX vs. FISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class M (FTISX) and Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTISX having a 10.37% return and FISMX slightly higher at 10.59%. Over the past 10 years, FTISX has underperformed FISMX with an annualized return of 8.39%, while FISMX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.95% annualized return.


FTISX

1D
-0.55%
1M
3.46%
YTD
10.37%
6M
12.69%
1Y
18.34%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
8.39%

FISMX

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.48%
YTD
10.59%
6M
12.97%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTISX vs. FISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTISX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class M
10.37%24.03%-0.46%18.97%-17.12%12.83%9.29%20.77%-16.57%31.41%
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
10.59%24.73%0.05%19.62%-16.66%13.44%9.98%21.45%-16.08%31.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FTISX and FISMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.98

The correlation between FTISX and FISMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTISX vs. FISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTISX
FTISX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FTISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTISX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FTISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTISX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FISMX
FISMX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTISX vs. FISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class M (FTISX) and Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTISXFISMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

1.64

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

2.37

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.86

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.39

6.66

-0.27

FTISX vs. FISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FISMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTISX and FISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTISXFISMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.64

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.47

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.64

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.74

-0.03

Drawdowns

FTISX vs. FISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTISX drawdown since its inception was -61.12%, roughly equal to the maximum FISMX drawdown of -60.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTISX and FISMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTISXFISMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.12%

-60.94%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-10.71%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-12.70%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

-31.07%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.55%

-38.80%

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.71%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.98%

-10.65%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.98%

+0.03%

Volatility

FTISX vs. FISMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class M (FTISX) and Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTISXFISMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.81%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

10.16%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

12.26%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

13.57%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.05%

14.06%

-0.01%

FTISX vs. FISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTISX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FISMX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTISX vs. FISMX - Dividend Comparison

FTISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than FISMX's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
3.24%3.58%2.64%1.87%0.70%7.28%0.83%2.32%6.14%2.46%2.70%2.80%
FTISX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class M
2.96%3.26%2.24%1.40%0.13%6.94%0.34%1.81%5.50%2.52%2.08%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FTISX and FISMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FISMX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to FTISX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTISX dropped -61.12% vs FISMX's -60.94%.

FISMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTISX and FISMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer