PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTIHX vs. FSTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTIHX vs. FSTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTIHX achieves a 15.53% return, which is significantly higher than FSTZX's 2.09% return.


FTIHX

1D
0.70%
1M
5.76%
YTD
15.53%
6M
18.30%
1Y
33.42%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*

FSTZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.09%
6M
2.02%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTIHX vs. FSTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
15.53%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%-0.77%
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
2.09%5.99%4.87%4.67%-2.83%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FTIHX and FSTZX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021

0.19

The correlation between FTIHX and FSTZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTIHX vs. FSTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTZX
FSTZX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FSTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTIHX vs. FSTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTIHXFSTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.65

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

6.68

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.54

24.52

-12.97

FTIHX vs. FSTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTIHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FSTZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTIHX and FSTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTIHXFSTZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.86

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.20

-0.57

Drawdowns

FTIHX vs. FSTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTIHX drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, which is greater than FSTZX's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIHX and FSTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTIHXFSTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.75%

-5.30%

-30.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.25%

-0.70%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-1.03%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-1.09%

-6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

0.19%

+2.66%

Volatility

FTIHX vs. FSTZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) at 0.51%. This indicates that FTIHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTIHXFSTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

0.51%

+4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

1.09%

+10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

1.64%

+12.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

2.79%

+12.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

2.79%

+13.26%

FTIHX vs. FSTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTIHX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTZX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTIHX vs. FSTZX - Dividend Comparison

FTIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than FSTZX's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.64%4.02%2.78%2.54%5.25%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.41%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTIHX and FSTZX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTIHX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FSTZX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIHX dropped -35.75% vs FSTZX's -5.30%.

FSTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTIHX and FSTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer