PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTHRX vs. VUBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTHRX vs. VUBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHRX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than VUBFX's 1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FTHRX has underperformed VUBFX with an annualized return of 2.04%, while VUBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.61% annualized return.


FTHRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.22%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
2.04%

VUBFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.75%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
5.33%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
2.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHRX vs. VUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
0.15%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%
VUBFX
Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares
1.37%5.04%5.99%5.43%-0.53%0.03%1.95%3.34%1.94%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHRX and VUBFX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.45

The correlation between FTHRX and VUBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTHRX vs. VUBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VUBFX
VUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHRX vs. VUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) and Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTHRXVUBFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

5.71

-4.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

12.83

-10.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

4.52

-3.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

14.79

-12.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.74

83.04

-77.30

FTHRX vs. VUBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the VUBFX Sharpe Ratio of 5.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHRX and VUBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTHRXVUBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

5.71

-4.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

3.47

-3.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

3.14

-2.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

3.11

-2.19

Drawdowns

FTHRX vs. VUBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHRX drawdown since its inception was -19.01%, which is greater than VUBFX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHRX and VUBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTHRXVUBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.01%

-1.86%

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-0.30%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.68%

-0.30%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.18%

-1.86%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.25%

-1.86%

-11.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

0.00%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-0.17%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.05%

+0.65%

Volatility

FTHRX vs. VUBFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares (VUBFX) at 0.17%. This indicates that FTHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTHRXVUBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.17%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.02%

0.54%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81%

0.77%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.03%

0.99%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.40%

0.83%

+2.57%

FTHRX vs. VUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHRX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VUBFX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTHRX vs. VUBFX - Dividend Comparison

FTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than VUBFX's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.69%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%
VUBFX
Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Investor Shares
4.42%4.62%5.42%4.06%1.28%0.43%1.52%2.58%2.13%1.43%0.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTHRX and VUBFX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTHRX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to VUBFX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHRX dropped -19.01% vs VUBFX's -1.86%.

VUBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.71 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTHRX and VUBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer