FTHNX vs. CSMDX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FTHNX (Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund) and CSMDX (Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FTHNX returned 12.63%/yr vs 5.09%/yr for CSMDX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FTHNX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CSMDX.

Performance

FTHNX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHNX achieves a 16.82% return, which is significantly higher than CSMDX's 13.17% return.

FTHNX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.84%
• 6M: 11.29%
• YTD: 16.82%
• 1Y: 28.52%
• 3Y*: 17.92%
• 5Y*: 12.63%
• 10Y*: 13.97%
• ALL TIME*: 13.46%

CSMDX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.75%
• 6M: 6.67%
• YTD: 13.17%
• 1Y: 16.86%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: 5.09%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FTHNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FTHNX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTHNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund	16.82%	11.69%	15.81%	22.18%	-7.73%	30.44%	10.05%	27.74%	-13.45%	13.59%
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund	13.17%	2.72%	2.24%	18.89%	-14.89%	22.60%	8.29%	29.90%	-5.20%	10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHNX and CSMDX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2017	0.92

The correlation between FTHNX and CSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTHNX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTHNX

FTHNX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FTHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FTHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FTHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FTHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FTHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

CSMDX

CSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 34
CSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
CSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTHNX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTHNX	CSMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.11	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	1.75	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.20	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	1.72	+1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.23	5.33	+4.89

FTHNX vs. CSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the CSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHNX and CSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTHNX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHNX drawdown since its inception was -37.78%, roughly equal to the maximum CSMDX drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHNX and CSMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTHNX	CSMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.78%	-37.28%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-9.20%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.63%	-24.60%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.63%	-24.60%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-1.31%	+0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-5.69%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	2.97%	-0.35%

Volatility

FTHNX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTHNX	CSMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	3.31%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.75%	10.17%	+0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.91%	14.39%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.78%	18.12%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.07%	19.07%	+1.00%

FTHNX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHNX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTHNX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison

FTHNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than CSMDX's 2.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund	2.77%	3.14%	1.33%	0.81%	4.07%	6.67%	0.38%	2.61%	4.40%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%
FTHNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund	0.24%	0.28%	7.84%	1.60%	0.95%	3.55%	0.11%	0.11%	0.21%	0.09%	0.00%	15.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTHNX and CSMDX in my portfolio?

FTHNX and CSMDX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTHNX or CSMDX?

FTHNX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to CSMDX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHNX dropped -37.78% vs CSMDX's -37.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.