FTHI vs. ACYS
FTHI (First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FTHI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
FTHI vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FTHI
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.65%
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.22M | $7.08M | $6.02M | |
| $23.68M | $20.77M | $17.60M |
FTHI vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF | 2.71% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTHI and ACYS is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTHI vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank
FTHI
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTHI vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF (FTHI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTHI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTHI vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTHI drawdown since its inception was -32.65%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHI and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTHI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.65% | -0.78% | -31.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -0.15% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -0.17% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | — | — |
Volatility
FTHI vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTHI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 3.76% | +5.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.38% | 3.76% | +9.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 3.76% | +10.41% |
FTHI vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTHI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTHI vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
FTHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF | 8.88% | 8.70% | 8.61% | 8.50% | 9.06% | 4.37% | 4.76% | 4.21% | 4.76% | 4.00% | 4.41% | 4.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTHI and ACYS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FTHI.
FTHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.88%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FTHI and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for FTHI and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer